Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 11.2% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN SHIRK-TERRELL NON PROFIT ADMINISTRATOR 9.0% of Rev
SHARON HILL Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
MARILEE LAKE Board President
PRATHYAKSHA PRASAD Board President
REYNA SPEARS Secretary
MOJGAN SAMARDAR Board Member
FOROUZAN ZAKERI Board Member
MATTHEW BUEHRER Board Member
DIANA BEGLEY Board Member
MARY CASEY Board Member
KAILEE RUE Board Member
CHRISTINE HIRSCH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lynn Shirk-Terrell Non-Profit Administrator 7.1% of Rev
Sharon Hill Treasurer 1.8% of Rev
Mojgan Samardar Board Member
Forouzan Betty Zakeri Board Member
Reyna Spears Board Member
Matthew Buehrer Board Member
Greg Enslen Board Member
Christine Hirsch Board President
Marilee Lake Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 49 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 20 points below the peer median (15 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.