Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 41 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BILL ALLISON Board Member
MAGEN ALLRED Board Member
ASAMI FLOYD Board Member
NORT HARRISON Secretary
MORT HILL Board Member
SARAH JACKSON Board Member
STEVE JACKSON Board President
BILL TALLENT JR Treasurer
BLAINE MARTIN Board Member
PETER MAYNARD Board Member
MARK MOORE Board President
JEFF TENHUNDFELD Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE JACKSON Board President
BILL TALLENT JR Treasurer
NORT HARRISON Secretary
ASAMI FLOYD Board Member
MORT HILL Board Member
BILL ALLISON Board Member
SARAH JACKSON Board Member
JEFF TENHUNDFELD Board Member
BLAINE MARTIN Board Member
MARK MOORE Board President
MAGEN ALLRED Board Member
PETER MAYNARD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points above the peer median (50 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.