Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 42 Fragile Recovery
2022 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIA M SEIGLIE Executive Director
ROGER D WIEGLEY Secretary
RICHARD W HILL Treasurer
YVONNE SANTA ANNA Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIA M SEIGLIE Executive Director
ROGER D WIEGLEY Secretary
RICHARD W HILL Treasurer
YVONNE SANTA ANNA Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIA M SEIGLIE Executive Director
ROGER D WIEGLEY Secretary
RICHARD W HILL Treasurer
YVONNE SANTA ANNA Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points below the peer median (0 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.