Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 31.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 31.4% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 27.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 36.5% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 31.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Fragile Recovery
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Miriam Gordon-Stewart Artistic Director 33.5% of Rev
Brenda Patterson Secretary 26.3% of Rev
Kristin Jensen Treasurer
Rita Dove Board Member
Jason Becton Board Member
Patrick Evans Board Member
Kirsten Mallik Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIRIAM GORDON-STEWART Artistic Director 28.6% of Rev
BRENDA PATTERSON Secretary 17.6% of Rev
WAYNE COZART Board Member
KRISTIN JENSEN Treasurer
KIRSTEN T MALLIK Board Member
RITA DOVE Board Member
JASON BECTON Board Member
PATRICK EVANS Board Member
RACHEL MINK Board Member
DAVID PORTILLO Board Member
CAROLYN ZELIKOW Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIRIAM GORDON-STEWART Artistic Director 38.6% of Rev
BRENDA PATTERSON Secretary 27.3% of Rev
Miriam Gordon-Stewart Artistic Director 16.9% of Rev
Brenda Patterson Secretary 14.3% of Rev
Frank Squillace Treasurer
Paul Wagner Board Member
Kirsten T Mallik Board Member
Kristin Jensen Board Member
Rita Dove Board Member
Troy Cook Board Member
KRISTIN JENSEN Treasurer
KIRSTEN T MALLIK Board Member
RITA DOVE Board Member
JASON BECTON Board Member
PATRICK EVANS Board Member
RACHEL MINK Board Member
DAVID PORTILLO Board Member
CAROLYN ZELIKOW Board Member
WAYNE COZART Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

Overall score has gone from 38 → 39 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.