Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
59
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 59 Fragile Recovery
2021 36.2% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 11.2% 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YI QUN XU Board Member 15.2% of Rev
YOON LEE Board Member 12.1% of Rev
EUN SUNG LEE Board Member
MATTHEW ZULLO Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
YOON LEE Board Member 12.6% of Rev
YI QUN XU Board Member 12.6% of Rev
EUN SUNG LEE Board Member
MATTHEW ZULLO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
59 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 69 points above the peer median (100 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 59 over 4 years (improving by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.