Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christie Headley Treasurer
Kelli Wilson Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Steve Tirendi Board Member
Damari Fallacaro Board Member
Coleen Casselli Board Member
Becky Diamond Board Member
Laura Goldman Board Member
Dori Keith Board Member
Deb Maccarella Board Member
Heather Moran Board Member
Kelli Wilson Board President
Pam McGrath Board Member
Nimi Meschkle Board President
Kristen Stewart Secretary
Christie Headley Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Steve Tirendi Board President
Damari Fallacaro Board President
Coleen Casselli Board Member
Becky Diamond Board Member
Laura Goldman Board Member
Dori Keith Board Member
Deb Maccarella Treasurer
Heather Moran Secretary
Kelli Wilson Board Member
Pam McGrath Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (55 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.