Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lisa Lashan Wolfe Executive Dir. 5.2% of Rev
Marci McCosh Executive Dir. 1.6% of Rev
Megan O Kaufman Board President 1.4% of Rev
Jan Shiff Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
Clair Reeves Secretary 0.5% of Rev
Brice Buenning Board Member
Rebecca J Vail Board Member
Lisa Allen Board President
Megan O Kaufman Board President
Lisa Brooks Board President
Jan Shiff Treasurer
Polly Johnson Secretary
Marci McCosh Executive Dir.
Brice Buenning Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGAN O KAUFMAN Board President
LISA ALLEN VICE PRESIDE
JAN SHIFF Treasurer
POLLY JOHNSON Secretary
DEANNA GUMMER Board Member
ALLEN RASSI Board Member
MARCI MCCOSH EXECUTIVE DI
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 123 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points above the peer median (65 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.