Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
54
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Wolber Board President
Doug Barbiero Board President
Debbie Barbiero Secretary
Harvey Factor Treasurer
Ellen Factor Board Member
Celeste Lauer Yanke Board Member
Alan Belbusti Advisory Non-voting
Linda Lawrence Advisory Non-voting
Maria Melchiori Advisory Non-voting
Margaret Maggie Hepworth Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Margaret Maggie Hepworth Board President
John Wolber Board President
Carol Blanc Secretary
Harvey Factor Treasurer
Ellen Factor Board Member
Celeste Lauer Yanke Board Member
Alan Belbusti Advisory Non-vote
Linda Lawrence Advisory Non-vote
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points above the peer median (75 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.