Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT D DONLEY Board President
ROSEMARIE DONLEY Secretary
TIMOTHY P BAKER Treasurer
JUDI DICKINSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT D DONLEY Board President
ROSEMARIE DONLEY Secretary
TIMOTHY P BAKER Treasurer
JUDI DICKINSON Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT D DONLEY Board President
ROSEMARIE DONLEY Secretary
TIMOTHY P BAKER Treasurer
JUDI DICKINSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in OH for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.