Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
32
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 5.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 10.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 24.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janeece Freeman-Clark Artistic Director 3.8% of Rev
Janeece Freeman-Clark Artistic Director 3.5% of Rev
Jessica Sporn Executive Director 1.9% of Rev
Jessica Sporn Board Member 1.8% of Rev
Hilary Hoover Board Member
Stacey Kilkenny Board Member
Meryl Budnick Board Member
Patti Gonzalez Board Member
Sariah Johnson Board Member
Ilena Silverman Board Member
Kate Larsen Board Member
Veena Raj Board Member
Maureen Ludwig Board Member
Christopher Joyce Board President
Lindsay Roberts Board President
Terri Gorgone Secretary
Melani Wilson Smith Treasurer
Anuraj Bismal Board Member
Hilary Hoover Board Member
Stacey Kilkenney Board Member
Meryl Budnick Board Member
MaryBeth Boger Board President
Jennene Tierney Board President
Ilena Silverman Board Member
Veena Raj Board Member
Kate Larsen Board Member
Maureen Ludwig Treasurer
Lindsay Roberts Board Member
Melani Wilson Smith Treasurer
Christopher Joyce Board Member
Terri Gorgone Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janeece Freeman-Clark Artistic Director 3.5% of Rev
Jessica Sporn Board Member 1.8% of Rev
Meryl Budnick Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Nadine Dubois Treasurer 0.1% of Rev
Patti Gonzalez Board Member
Sariah Johnson Board Member
Ilena Silverman Board Member
Christopher Joyce Board President
Kawanzaa King Board President
Terri Gorgone Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Janeece Freeman-Clack Board Member 2.9% of Rev
Janeece Freeman-Clack Unspecified Role 2.9% of Rev
Jessica Sporn Executive Dir. 1.2% of Rev
Jessica Sporn Unspecified Role 1.2% of Rev
Melissa McHugh Unspecified Role 0.5% of Rev
Tira Johnson-Allen Unspecified Role 0.4% of Rev
Nadine Dubois Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
Nadine Dubois Unspecified Role 0.3% of Rev
Meryl Budnick Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Terri Gorgone Secretary 0.2% of Rev
Patty Gonzalez Board Member
Sahirah Johnson Board Member
Ilena Silverman Board Member
Christopher Joyce Board President
Kawanzaa King Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 175 other orgs in NJ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points below the peer median (0 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.