Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
28
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 23.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 11.3% 37 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 671.9% 11 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 21.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KHRIS DODGE Executive Director 22.5% of Rev
BRANDI HAGA-BLACKMAN Board President 1.1% of Rev
ANGELO VERSACE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
CINDY AGUILAR Board Member —
MARY ELLINGSEN Board Member —
STEPHEN POPE Board Member —
PATRICIA RYBOLT Board Member —
ALAN STEIN Board President —
LAURA LIEWEN Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KHRIS DODGE Executive Director 22.1% of Rev
KHRIS DODGE Executive Director 16.5% of Rev
ANGELO VERSACE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
BRANDI HAGA-BLACKMAN Secretary —
LAURA LIEWEN Treasurer —
MARY ELLINGSEN Board Member —
STEVEN POPE Board Member —
JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD Board Member —
LOUIS SALUTE Board Member —
ANGELO VERSACE Board Member —
BRANDI HAGA-BLACKMAN Board President —
ELLIOT GLICKSMAN Board President —
STEVEN POPE Board Member —
DAN GIBSON Board President —
LAURA LIEWEN Treasurer —
MARY ELLINGSEN Board Member —
JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD Board Member —
LOUIS SALUTE Board Member —
ALAN STEIN Board President —
PATRICIA UNDERWOOD Board Member —
ELLIOT GLICKSMAN Board President —
DAN GIBSON Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY ELLINGSEN VOLUNTEER COORDINATOR —
JONATHAN ROTHSCHILD Board Member —
STEVEN POPE Board Member —
LOUIS SALUTE Board Member —
ANGELO VERSACE Board Member —
ELLIOT GLICKSMAN Board President —
DAN GIBSON Board President —
BRANDI HAGA-BLACKMAN Secretary —
LAURA LIEWEN Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 147 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 26 points below the peer median (15 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.