Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 11.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 15.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — — 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AE-DEOK LEE CHO Board President 11.1% of Rev
GEESOOK BAIK Treasurer —
JUYEUN CHAE Secretary —
ESTHER YANG Board Member —
EUPIL CHOI Board Member —
CHRISTINA KIM Board Member —
JANE LEE Board Member —
JEONGMI CHIN Board Member —
JOHN J KIM Board Member —
JUNGHEE KANG Board Member —
JUNGJA HURH Board Member —
IAN JO Board Member —
KWANHEON RIM Board Member —
JUNG M KWON Board Member —
JINHWA SUH Board Member —
MOON S LIM Board Member —
SUNGJU LEE Board Member —
INJOO PARK Board Member —
JIEUN OH Board Member —
JIEUN HA Board Member —
EUNYOUNG HUR Board Member —
MOONHWA PARK Board Member —
POONGJA L CHO Board Member —
RANSIL PARK Board Member —
YOUNGSOOK HAHN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AEDEOK LEE Board President —
GEESOOK BAIK Treasurer —
JUYEUN CHAE Secretary —
ESTHER YANG Board President —
EUPIL CHOI Board Member —
CHRISTINA KIM Board Member —
JANE LEE Board Member —
JEONGMI CHIN Board Member —
JOHN KIM Board Member —
JUNGHEE KANG Board Member —
JUNGJA HURH Board Member —
IAN JO Board Member —
KWANHEON RIM Board Member —
JUNG M KWON Board Member —
JINHWA SUH Board Member —
MOONSANG LIM Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AEDEOK LEE Board President —
GEESOOK BAIK Treasurer —
JUYEUN CHAE Secretary —
ESTHER YANG Board President —
EUPIL CHOI Board Member —
GRACE SUNG Board Member —
JANE LEE Board Member —
JEONGMI CHIN Board Member —
JOHN KIM Board Member —
JUNGHEE KANG Board Member —
JUNGJA HURH Board Member —
KYUNGHUI KIM Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 376 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points below the peer median (25 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 51 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.