Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
26
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
20
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACOB MICHELSON Board President
JACOB MICHELSON Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACOB MICHELSON Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACOB MICHELSON Board President
JACOB MICHELSON Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
20 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points below the peer median (0 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.