Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2017 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lily Gardner Board President —
Shane Leinhauser Board President —
Alexis Hammond Secretary —
Lauryn May Board Member —
Regina Hennesy Board Member —
Hugh Cleland-Batt Treasurer —
Chloe Caplan Stars Coordinator —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexa Pennington Board President —
Sam Padilla Board President —
Trey Andrusky Secretary —
Gabriella Natale Board Member —
Doug DeVincent Board Member —
Lu Collina Treasurer —
Abigail Shuker Stars Coordinator —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Rodefeld Board President —
Alexa Vernice Board President —
Giulia Mazzella Secretary —
Jo Dean Board Member —
Alexa Pennington Board Member —
Keeghan McLane Treasurer —
Samantha Padilla Stars Coordinator —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Rodefeld Board President —
Alexa Vernice Board President —
Grace Rogers Secretary —
Kathryn Price Board Member —
Jacob Coll Board Member —
Giulia Mazzella Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 462 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.