Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lily Gardner Board President
Shane Leinhauser Board President
Alexis Hammond Secretary
Lauryn May Board Member
Regina Hennesy Board Member
Hugh Cleland-Batt Treasurer
Chloe Caplan Stars Coordinator

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexa Pennington Board President
Sam Padilla Board President
Trey Andrusky Secretary
Gabriella Natale Board Member
Doug DeVincent Board Member
Lu Collina Treasurer
Abigail Shuker Stars Coordinator

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Rodefeld Board President
Alexa Vernice Board President
Giulia Mazzella Secretary
Jo Dean Board Member
Alexa Pennington Board Member
Keeghan McLane Treasurer
Samantha Padilla Stars Coordinator

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Anna Rodefeld Board President
Alexa Vernice Board President
Grace Rogers Secretary
Kathryn Price Board Member
Jacob Coll Board Member
Giulia Mazzella Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.