Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
63
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2022 — — 6.4% 63 Stable Stable Watch
2021 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 7.9% 59 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Colleen C Benoit Board President 6.4% of Rev
Colleen C Benoit Board President 6.4% of Rev
Kim Moreno Treasurer —
Kristin Draper Board Member —
Laura Henry Board President —
Kari Hankins Secretary —
Kim Moreno Treasurer —
Kristin Draper Board Member —
Laura Henry Board President —
Kari Hankins Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Colleen C Benoit Board President 6.4% of Rev
Kim Moreno Treasurer —
Kristin Draper Board Member —
Laura Henry Board President —
Kari Hankins Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Colleen C Benoit Board President 5.9% of Rev
Kim Moreno Treasurer —
Colleen C Benoit Board President —
Kristin Draper Board Member —
Laura Henry Board President —
Kari Hankins Secretary —
Kim Moreno Treasurer —
Kristin Draper Board Member —
Laura Henry Board President —
Kari Hankins Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
63 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 98 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points above the peer median (90 vs. 57).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.