Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction ↓
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 17.6% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 — — 6.1% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 11.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 15.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 26.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 18.3% 36 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SOMMER SCHOCH PRODUCING AR 17.6% of Rev
ROBERT ARENA Board Member —
DAVID EADS Secretary —
JADE ELLIS Board President —
JAMES ENGLAND Board Member —
TINA GEORGE Board President —
SHEILA HUGGES Board Member —
LAURA KAMPERMAN Treasurer —
STEVE KERNSTOCK Board Member —
TRAVIS ROGERS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SOMMER SCHOCH PRODUCING AR 14.6% of Rev
SOMMER SCHOCH PRODUCING AR 14.6% of Rev
MARK BRENZEL Board Member —
STEVE CLEBERG Treasurer —
DAVID EADS Secretary —
JADE ELLIS Board President —
TINA GEORGE Board Member —
SHEILA HUGGES Board President —
JOSEPH WEIGEL Board Member —
COLLEEN BIVENS Board Member —
MARK BRENZEL Board Member —
STEVE CLEBERG Treasurer —
DAVID EADS Secretary —
JADE ELLIS Board President —
TINA GEORGE Board Member —
SHEILA HUGGES Board President —
JOSEPH WEIGEL Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SOMMER SCHOCH PRODUCING AR 11.7% of Rev
MARK BRENZEL Treasurer —
DAVID EADS Board Member —
CHRIS GEORGE Board Member —
TINA GEORGE Board President —
SHEILA HUGGES Board President —
DEBBIE OLIVER Board Member —
JOSEPH WEIGEL Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sommer Schoch Artistic Director 10.2% of Rev
Sheila Hugges Board President —
Christine George Board President —
Chris George Board Member —
David Eads OD Secretary —
Mark Brenzel Treasurer —
Joseph Weigel MD Board Member —
Jade Ellis Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 91 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 25 points below the peer median (30 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.