Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 15.1% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 13.0% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 11.1% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 4.1% 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 7.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 7.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 18 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS MANUEL Board President 10.2% of Rev
RAY ANDERSON Board President 0.1% of Rev
KATHERINE BUTKEVICH Treasurer
ROBERT TAYLOR Board Member
LAURA LANDOR Board Member
LAURA VOGELSBERG Board Member
JEAN PRYSOCK Board Member
MICHAEL ARDOLINO Board Member
STEWART MANDELL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
THOMAS MANUEL Board President 1.2% of Rev
RAY ANDERSON Board President 0.4% of Rev
KATHERINE BUTKEVICH Treasurer
ROBERT TAYLOR Board Member
LAURA LANDOR Board Member
LAURA VOGELSBERG Board Member
JEAN PRYSOCK Board Member
MICHAEL ARDOLINO Board Member
STEWART MANDELL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.