Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 8.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 59.5% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kencina N Williams Executive Director 21.6% of Rev
Whitney McIntosh-Joseph Board Member 4.3% of Rev
Mia Adams Board Member 3.4% of Rev
Ronald Martin Board Member 3.1% of Rev
Nanonte Dailey Board Member 2.9% of Rev
Michelle Vinson Board Member 2.1% of Rev
Michelle Joseph Strategic Advisor
Melnia Cordis Nonprofit Management
Medha Bhalodkar Security & Technology
Han-Hsien Tran Attorney
Duncan Huie Chief Financial Officer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicole Williams Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicole Williams Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.