Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STAR OLSEN Board Member
KARLA KENT Board Member
DAVE MORGAN Board Member
JESSICA HUCKABY Board Member
GLEN PERAZZO Secretary
NANCY UPHAM Treasurer
STUART RICHARDSON Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KARLA KENT Board Member
STUART RICHARDSON Board Member
MIKE BERNEY Board President
TERRI PEREIRA Secretary
NANCY UPHAM Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 27 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points above the peer median (50 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.