Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
21
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 40.4% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 11.5% 38 Fragile Recovery
2021 12.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 44 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON SALLEY Board President 6.1% of Rev
SHAKINA NAYFACK Board President 4.9% of Rev
ARIDY NOX Secretary
CAROLINE SAMUELS Treasurer
CATHERINE PULLEY Board Member
AARON GLICK Board Member
MEGAN SAVAGE Board Member
JULIAN FLEISHER Board Member
FIONA GOH-TAN Board Member
KENT NICHOLSON Board Member
JEFFREY TRACHTMAN Board Member
JANE JUNG Board Member
OPHELIA CHUA Board Member
JULIET MOSER Board Member
TROY ANTHONY Board Member
MELISSA HAIZLIP Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON SALLEY Board President
CAROLINE SAMUELS Treasurer
ARIDY NOX Secretary
AARON GLICK Board President
CATHERINE PULLEY Board President
SHAKINA NAYFACK FOUNDING AD
MEGAN SAVAGE Board Member
JULIAN FLEISHER Board Member
FIONA GOH-TAN Board Member
KENT NICHOLSON Board Member
JEFFREY TRACHTMAN Board Member
JANE JUNG Board Member
OPHELIA CHUA Board Member
JULIET MOSER Board Member
TROY ANTHONY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AARON SALLEY Board President
AARON GLICK Board President
CAROLINE SAMUELS Treasurer
ARIDY NOX Secretary
SHAKINA NAYFACK Board Member
MEGAN SAVAGE Board Member
JULIAN FLEISHER Board Member
CRAIG LOVE Board Member
CATHERINE PULLEY Board Member
AMIEE TURNER Board Member
FIONA GOH-TAN Board Member
KENT NICHOLSON Board Member
JEFFREY TRACHTMAN Board Member
JANE JUNG Board Member
OPHELIA CHUA Board Member
JULIET MOSER Board Member
TROY ANTHONY Board Member
MEI ANN TEO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
21 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 699 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (0 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 21 over 5 years (declining by 23 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 40.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~37 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.