Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 136.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 92.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 -984.8% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 64.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 72.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 73.6% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 18.2% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Recovery
2011 45.8% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA WILHELM Board President 117.8% of Rev
FREDERICK A WILHELM Treasurer 35.3% of Rev
GERRY ISAAC Board Member
MARTHA PAZ Y PUENTE Board Member
CYNTHIA COLBERT Board Member
CHIP FEARS Board Member
PAT WATROUS Board Member
RENATE KLOPPINGER Board Member
EVAN P KORY Secretary
MIKE MASSEE Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA WILHELM Board President 117.8% of Rev
FREDERICK A WILHELM Treasurer 35.3% of Rev
EVAN P KORY Secretary 26.2% of Rev
GERRY ISAAC Board Member
MARTHA PAZ PUENTE Board Member
CYNTHIA COLBERT Board Member
CHIP FEARS Board Member
CLAUDIA PROTO Board Member
PAT WATROUS Board Member
RENATE KLOPPINGER Board Member
MIKE MASSEE Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRISTINA WILHELM Board President 117.8% of Rev
FREDERICK A WILHELM Treasurer 47.7% of Rev
EVAN P KORY Secretary 33.1% of Rev
RENATE KLOPPINGER Board Member
MARTHA PAZ PUENTE Board Member
GERRY ISAAC Board Member
CLAUDIA PROTO Board Member
PAT WATROUS Board Member
MIKE MASSEE Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 118 other orgs in AZ with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 33 → 32 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 136.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.