Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 21.4% 35 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 22.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 20.8% 41 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 23.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 21.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 17.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 15.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 12.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 18.2% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 15.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 13.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARCY BRANDT EXECUTIVE DI 21.4% of Rev
DENISE EMAL Board President —
ANGELA FINN Board Member —
JANENE HILL Board Member —
NICKOLA VAN HORN Secretary —
JULIE KRULL Board Member —
TRAVIS OLTMAN VICE PRESIDE —
CONNOR PETERSEN Treasurer —
MILES STEEN Board Member —
DESIRAE TIRA Board Member —
KIM TOLINE Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARCY BRANDT EXECUTIVE DI 18.6% of Rev
DENISE EMAL Secretary —
ANGELA FINN VICE PRESIDE —
LAURA GRAMS Treasurer —
DOUG HAMMER Board Member —
NICK HANSEN Board Member —
JANENE HILL Board President —
LESLIE LAMBERT Board Member —
RON NELSON Board Member —
TRAVIS OLTMAN Board Member —
MILES STEEN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARCY BRANDT Executive Director 17.4% of Rev
ROB ARMSTRONG Treasurer —
ANGELA FINN Board President —
DOUG HAMMER Board Member —
LESLIE LAMBERT Board Member —
DENISE EMAL Board Member —
RON NELSON Secretary —
JANENE HILL Board President —
LAURA GRAMS Board Member —
NICK HANSEN Board Member —
MILES STEEN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARCY BRANDT Executive Director 18.0% of Rev
ROB ARMSTRONG Treasurer —
ANGELA FINN Board President —
MARY LIESKE Board Member —
LESLIE LAMBERT Board Member —
CODY KRULL Board Member —
RON NELSON Secretary —
JANENE HILL Board President —
LAURA GRAMS Board Member —
NICK HANSEN Board Member —
MILES STEEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 50 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (25 vs. 64).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.