Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 23.4% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 19.7% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 13.7% 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 23.0% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 20.0% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 16.6% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 15.8% 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 22.0% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 18.4% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 15.5% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 15.9% 41 Fragile Recovery
2013 18.2% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 19.8% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 17.9% 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY RANDALL Board Member 23.3% of Rev
VIRGINIA CARR Board President
SHEILA SCHMEITS Treasurer
JO UNDERWOOD Secretary
BECKY MITCHELL Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY RANDALL Board Member 19.8% of Rev
VIRGINIA CARR Board President
SHEILA SCHMEITS Treasurer
SHANNON KINSELLA Secretary
BECKY MITCHELL Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CINDY RANDALL Board Member 19.8% of Rev
VIRGINIA CARR Board President
SHEILA SCHMEITS Treasurer
SHANNON KINSELLA Secretary
BECKY MITCHELL Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 11 points below the peer median (5 vs. 16).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 23.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.