Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 26.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 22.6% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 18.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 21.7% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 15.9% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 14.8% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 14.2% 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 15.6% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 14.2% 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 17.1% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — 15.2% 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 18.1% 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER MARSHALL Board Member —
DEREK BOECKNER Board Member —
JENNIFER HARVEY Board Member —
JEFF ENSZ Board Member —
MIKE KATHOL Board Member —
ALEX SCHWARZ Board Member —
LISA HAJDA Board Member —
TIFFANY STOIBER Board Member —
DAVID ROZEMA Board Member —
AMY HASKETT Board President —
JEFF KNAPP Treasurer —
JOSH STOIBER Board President —
JUDY ROZEMA Executive Director —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKE KATHOL Board Member —
ALEX SCHWARZ Board Member —
JOSH STOIBER Board Member —
LISA HAJDA Board Member —
TIFFANY STOIBER Board Member —
AMY HASKETT Board President —
ERIC KITZELMAN Board President —
JEFF KNAPP Treasurer —
JENNIFER MARSHALL Board Member —
DEREK BOECKNER Board Member —
JENNIFER HARVEY Board Member —
JEFF ENSZ Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board President —
AMY HASKETT Board Member —
LAUREN BONK Board Member —
BOBBI DICKERSON Board Member —
JEFF ENSZ Board Member —
ERIC KITZELMAN Board Member —
BRIAN MOORE Board Member —
JOSH STOIBER Board Member —
LISA HAJDA Board Member —
SARA HOMAN Board President —
TONY HOOTON Board Member —
JEFF KNAPP Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board President —
AMY HASKETT Board Member —
LAUREN BONK Board Member —
BOBBI DICKERSON Board Member —
JEFF ENSZ Board Member —
ERIC KITZELMAN Board Member —
KAYLEE ROTH Board Member —
JONI KUZMA Board Member —
SARA HOMAN Board President —
TONY HOOTON Board Member —
JEFF KNAPP Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 50 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 30 points below the peer median (42 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.