Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kristie Van Bogart Board President
JoAnn Hoffman Board President
Charlotte Cushman Treasurer
Emily Rowe Secretary
Connie Wolters Board Member
Deb Auch Board Member
Vicki Barlean Board Member
Twila Morris Board Member
Colleen Marie Boling Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sherry Liddell Board President
JoAnn Hoffman Board President
Heidi Stahl Treasurer
Kristie Van Bogart Secretary
Connie Wolters Board Member
Deb Auch Board Member
Vicki Barlean Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sherry Liddell Board President
JoAnn Hoffman Board President
Marian Johnson Treasurer
Kristie Van Bogart Secretary
Connie Wolters Board Member
Kathryn Cleveland Board Member
Lee Ann Jensen Board Member
Pat Dickey Board Member
Deb Auch Board Member
Vicki Barlean Board Member
Twila Morris Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in SD with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 13 points below the peer median (5 vs. 18).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 35 over 5 years (declining by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.