Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
27
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 32.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 35.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 48.9% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 39.1% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 52.1% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 57.9% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 22.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 10.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alexandru Glushacov Artistic Director 32.2% of Rev
Melissa Zoebisch Executive Director
Connie Flieder Secretary
Laurentia Duffy Board President
David Taylor Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
A GLUSHACOV ART DIR/INSTRU 15.5% of Rev
DAVID TAYLOR ART DIR/INSTRU 10.8% of Rev
M ZOEBISCH EXECUTIVE DIR 8.6% of Rev
A SIMPSON ADMINISTRATOR 6.3% of Rev
C HILLERMAN INTSTRUCTOR 5.1% of Rev
M LANCASTER-GA TEACHER 4.2% of Rev
M FAUSTINO TEACHER 3.1% of Rev
PAM GLEAVE TEACHER 1.3% of Rev
AMY FONG TEACHER 0.8% of Rev
J FLIEDER MAINTENANCE 0.8% of Rev
H MCCALL TEACHER 0.7% of Rev
LISA SWENSEN REGISTRAR 0.3% of Rev
C FLIEDER Secretary
LAURENTIA DUFF Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
27 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points below the peer median (25 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 19 → 27 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 32.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~20 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.