Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
15
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 32.8% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 36.0% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 16.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 3.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 26.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEVERLY WASZAK KRUSHAT Board President
JIM BAGLEY Secretary
MARK SPANGENBERG Board Member
CASEY KIERNAN Board President
ED KEESLING Board Member
JOHN COLE Treasurer
MIKE CONGDON Board Member
VICKIE WAITE Board Member
TERI BEDILION Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE WAITE Board Member 32.8% of Rev
BEVERLY WASZAK KRUSHAT Board President
JIM BAGLEY Secretary
MARK SPANGENBERG Board Member
CASEY KIERNAN Board Member
ED KEESLING Board Member
BOBBY FURST Board Member
JOHN COLE Treasurer
MIKE CONGDON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
VICKIE WAITE Board Member 28.1% of Rev
BEVERLY WASZAK KRUSHAT Board President
JIM BAGLEY Secretary
CATHERINE GRILLO Board Member
MICHEAL COOK Board President
ED KEESLING Board Member
BOBBY FURST Board Member
JOHN COLE Treasurer
MIKE CONGDON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
15 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 32.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~22 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.