Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 13.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 18.1% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 10.6% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — 7.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 9.2% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 5.9% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 15.1% 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — 28.9% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA ABBOTT Executive Director 15.8% of Rev
MARY CHURCH CORNETTE Board Member —
EARLE FURMAN Board Member —
DAN HELWING Treasurer —
BEN HEPNER Board Member —
BLAIR KNOBEL Secretary —
KACEE LOMINACK Board Member —
VEE POPAT Board Member —
NATHAN REYNOLDS Board Member —
LIZ RUNDORFF-SMITH Board Member —
BILL STEPHENSON Board President —
BRADLEY WINGATE Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESSICA BURGESS EXECUTIVE DI 8.6% of Rev
JIM GORMAN Secretary —
DANIEL HARTWAY Board Member —
BEN HEPNER Board Member —
SAM JENKINS Board Member —
YVONNE JULIAN Board President —
BLAIR KNOBEL Board Member —
KATE LACHER Board Member —
LINDSAY ODOM Board Member —
VEE POPAT Board Member —
RHONDA RAWLINGS Board Member —
NATHAN REYNOLDS Board Member —
HEATHER WHELESS Board Member —
BRADLEY WINGATE BOARD VICE C —
ANNE Q BARR Board Member —
TONY CALLANDER Treasurer —
DIANA FARFAN Board Member —
EARLE FURMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM FABIAN EXECUTIVE DI 9.7% of Rev
RANDY ARMSTRONG Board Member —
ANNE Q BARR Board Member —
BRYANT BROWN Board Member —
CARRIE BURNS BROWN Board Member —
TONY CALLANDER Treasurer —
DIANA FARFAN Board Member —
EARLE FURMAN Board Member —
JIM GORMAN Secretary —
TRACY HARDAWAY Board Member —
DANIEL HARTWAY Board Member —
BEN HEPNER Board Member —
JULIO HERNANDEZ Board Member —
SAM JENKINS Board Member —
REBECCA JOHNSON Board Member —
YVONNE JULIAN Board President —
PAT KILBURG CHAIRMAN —
BLAIR KNOBEL Board Member —
KATE LACHER Board Member —
LINDSAY ODOM Board Member —
VEE POPAT Board Member —
RHONDA RAWLINGS Board Member —
NATHAN REYNOLDS Board Member —
HEATHER WHELESS Board Member —
BRADLEY WINGATE BOARD VICE P —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIM FABIAN EXECUTIVE DI 11.0% of Rev
ANNE Q BARR Board Member —
TONY CALLANDER Treasurer —
DIANA FARFAN Board Member —
ELIZABETH FLETCHER Board Member —
JIM GORMAN Secretary —
JO WATSON HACKL Board Member —
TRACY T HARDAWAY Board Member —
JULIO HERNANDEZ Board Member —
SAM JENKINS Board Member —
YVONNE JULIAN VICE PRESIDE —
PAT KILBURG CHAIRMAN —
BILL MCLENDON Board Member —
CLARK MICKEL Board Member —
LINDSAY ODOM Board Member —
VEE POPAT Board Member —
TRACY RAMSEUR Board Member —
NATHAN REYNOLDS Board Member —
BRADLEY WINGATE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 53 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.