Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
41
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2019 4.5% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 3.5% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 3.0% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 3.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 2.8% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL A TOMOR Executive Director 6.1% of Rev
DEBORAH MCCARTHY Treasurer 2.1% of Rev
MARK ANDERSON Board President
CORNELIA CORBETT Board President
PENNY VINIK Board President
THOMAS HOCHHAUSLER Treasurer
JAMIE FERNANDEZ Secretary
ALLISON ADAMS Board President
CHAD CALLAHAN Board Member
HAL FLOWERS Board Member
CHRISTINE PHILLIPS Board Member
DENNIS ROGERO Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 41 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.