Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 27.4% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 64 Stable Stable Watch
2019 — — — 58 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JUSTIN PIKE Artistic Director 15.4% of Rev
KAYLA JENNINGS Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
ANTHONY NYUYEN Treasurer —
SARAH CARNAHAN Secretary —
MADISON WOLFF Board President —
HEATHER ZACHARY Board President —
RACHEL BASS Board Member —
BILLIE OVERSTREET PARLAMENTARIAN —
WHITNEY HALL Board Member —
GABRIEL WASHAM Board Member —
TAIJEE BUNCH Board Member —
SARA REYNOLDS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LINDSEY BOERNER Board Member —
DANNY TROILLETT Board Member —
BROOKE WAALLACE Board Member —
AMANDA KENNEDY Board Member —
SATIA SPENCER Board Member —
CAMERON HAGGERTY Board Member —
LEAH GOLLEHER Board Member —
ALLISON COURTNEY Board Member —
SARAH BARLOW Board Member —
MADISON WOLFF Board President —
SARAH CARNAHAN Secretary —
HEATHER ZACHARY Board President —
ANTHONY NYUYEN Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALYSON COURTNEY Board Member —
MARCIA BROWN Board President —
ADISON WOLFF Secretary —
LEAH GOLLEHER Board President —
HEATHER ZACHARY Board Member —
AMANDA KENNEDY Treasurer —
DIPETTE JOSEPH Board Member —
ADEL VIKTORIA Board Member —
TROILLETT DANNY Board Member —
CARNAHAN SARAH Board Member —
WEST JAMES Board Member —
SATIA SPENCER Board Member —
ALYSON COURTNEY Board Member —
MARCIA BROWN Board President —
MADISON WOLFF Secretary —
LEAH GOLLEHER Board President —
HEATHER ZACHARY Board Member —
AMANDA KENNEDY Treasurer —
DIPETTE JOSEPH Board Member —
ADEL VIKTORIA Board Member —
TROILLETT DANNY Board Member —
CARNAHAN SARAH Board Member —
WEST JAMES Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 44 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (5 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~11 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.