Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARB COLEHOUR Board Member
LORI MAACH Board President
ERIC HANSON Secretary
MONICA CHALLENGER Board Member
DAVID LAWRENCE Board Member
JILL WILKINS Board Member
JACOB WILLIAMS Treasurer
JULIE KRAFT VICE PRESIDE
CAMERON SULLENBERGER CO-FOUNDER
BRIAN GLICK CO-FOUNDER

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BARB COLEHOUR Board Member
VANNESSIA KLINSKY Board President
DAVID MAIER Secretary
PEG DETWEILER Treasurer
LORI MAACH Board Member
ERIC HANSON Board Member
MARIA SANCHEZ-MASI Board Member
MONICA CHALLENGER Board Member
STEVEN GINSBERG Board Member
DAVID MCINALLY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 11 points above the peer median (50 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.