Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH EFFERTZ Executive Director
MARKO MARCINKO Board Member
GEOFF PIZZUTO Board Member
DAVID RUDIS Board Member
FRANK BOLLOCK Board Member
GERSHAM SPENGLER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH EFFERTZ Executive Director
MARKO MARCINKO Board Member
GEOFF PIZZUTO Board Member
DAVID RUDIS Board Member
FRANK BOLLOCK Board Member
GERSHAM SPENGLER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH EFFERTZ Executive Director
MARKO MARCINKO Board Member
GEOFF PIZZUTO Board Member
DAVID RUDIS Board Member
FRANK BOLLOCK Board Member
GERSHAM SPENGLER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT SHLESINGER Board Member
MARKO MARCINKO Board Member
PHILIP STEVENS Board Member
DR HARMAR BRERETON Board Member
ROBERT SYLVESTER Board Member
DR TED TOMAZEWSKI Board Member
LESLIE BRERETON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.