Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — — 58 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 62 Stable Stable Watch
2020 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nina Klyvert-Lawson Artistic Director —
Darrell Moultrie Board President —
Tracy Hyter- Suffern Board Member —
Tracy Ashe Board Member —
Arielle McCoy Board Member —
Ronald R Lawson Treasurer —
Nina Klyvert-Lawson Artistic Director —
Darrell Moultrie Board President —
Tracy Hyter-Suffern Board Member —
Tracy Ashe Board Member —
Arielle McCoy Board Member —
Ronald R Lawson Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 142 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 29 points below the peer median (50 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 51 over 4 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.