Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 32.1% | 46 | Governance-Stressed | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RACHEAL SEIBERT | EXECUTIVE DI | 21.3% of Rev | ||
| PETER ANAGNOSTOS | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD A BARONE | CHAIRMAN, PR | — | ||
| LORRAINE DODERO | Board Member | — | ||
| ANTONIA HADAD | Board Member | — | ||
| MURLAN J MURPHY | Board Member | — | ||
| CINDY STEEB | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETER ANAGNOSTOS | Secretary | — | ||
| RICHARD A BARONE | CHAIRMAN, PR | — | ||
| MURLAN J MURPHY | Board Member | — | ||
| SHARON PARKER | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHAEL SCHWARTZ | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 10 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A5.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 6 points above the peer median (50 vs. 44).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 49 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.