Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
42
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 26.0% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 12.9% 35 Fragile Recovery
2021 35.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 18.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HECTOR ARMIENTA Board President 26.0% of Rev
ANITA GARCIA Secretary
ELIZABETH HERNANDEZ Treasurer
CLAUDIA LOPEZ BOARD DIRECT

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Hector Armienta Executive Director 24.7% of Rev
Anita Garcia Secretary
Elizabeth Hernandez Treasurer
Claudia Lopez Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Hector Armienta Executive Director
Anita Garcia Secretary
Elizabeth Hernandez Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Hector Armienta Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
Anita Garcia Secretary
Katherine Blackmer Reyes Secretary
Elizabeth Hernandez Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (50 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 26.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~8 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.