Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
41
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 28.7% 41 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 — — 17.1% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — — 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 18.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY MARVEL Board Member 28.7% of Rev
APRIL HILL Board President —
ANGIE LUCKIE Secretary —
SCOTT JAMISON Board Member —
JACOB LOVE Board Member —
GREG SHERRILL GOVERNANCE C —
SUSAN HERRERA Board Member —
HOLLY HAMBRIGHT Board Member —
SHEENA MCALL Board Member —
STANTON WEBSTER Board President —
JEFF ARBITAL Board Member —
TAYLOR COLTON STONE Board Member —
CHRIS WEATERS Board Member —
EMILY CHANG Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY Board Member 16.3% of Rev
JERROLD BECKER Board President —
KIMBERLY HENRY Board President —
DOMINICK WHITE Board Member —
JAMES MARVEL Board President —
APRIL HILL Treasurer —
ANGIE LUCKIE Secretary —
SCOTT JAMISON Board Member —
SHEENA MCCALL Board Member —
TOM FINE Board Member —
PATRICIA MAFFEO Board Member —
FRANK MURPHY Board Member —
JACOB LOVE Board Member —
TYLER JANOW DEVELOPMENT —
MARY MORRIS Board Member —
TONY DEATON Board Member —
GREG SHERRILL GOVERNANCE C —
SUSAN HERRERA Board Member —
SAVANNAH SCHULTZ Board Member —
DAVID CRAWFORD Board Member —
JUDY COLLINS Board Member —
MICHELLE CLAYTON Board Member —
JOSH PURVIS Board Member —
CHRIS WEATERS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHRYN FRADY Board Member 14.3% of Rev
MARDEL FEHRENBACK Board President —
JERROLD BECKER Board President —
KIMBERLY HENRY Board President —
DOMINICK WHITE Board Member —
JOE TRAHERN Board Member —
JAMES MARVEL Board Member —
MICHAEL TORANO Secretary —
CHISSY KEUPER Board Member —
SHEENA MCCALL Board Member —
TOM FINE Board Member —
PATRICIA MAFFEO Board Member —
APRIL HILL Treasurer —
FRANK MURPHY Board Member —
JACOB LOVE Board Member —
DELORES ZIEGLER Board Member —
MARY MORRIS Board Member —
MICHAEL COMBS Board Member —
VICTOR CHAVEZ Board Member —
GREG SHERRILL Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 129 other orgs in TN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 32 points below the peer median (42 vs. 74).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.