Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — — 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 6.7% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 2.8% 53 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 14.5% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 5.6% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 3.4% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 — — 7.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 0.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Kacergis Artistic Director 1.2% of Rev
Kassia Perpich Executive Director 1.0% of Rev
Kathleen Oswald Board President —
William Parfet Board President —
Jane Warner Secretary —
Bill Clements Treasurer —
David V Johnson Board President —
David Crouse Board Member —
Andrew Cummings Board Member —
Don DeFosset Board Member —
Jon Glass Board Member —
Orlene Hawks Board Member —
Lin Henkel Board Member —
Lisa Herrick Parker Board Member —
Richard Hirrel Board Member —
Paul Knapp Board Member —
Bill Mansfield Board Member —
Sandy Mosher Board Member —
Irene Rogerson Board Member —
Bob Walker Board Member —
Kurt Wietzke Board Member —
Jason Zylstra Board Member —
Annette Pocica Ended Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW WAWRO DEVELOPMENT 1.9% of Rev
JILL O'NEILL EXECUTIVE DI 0.6% of Rev
MARIE KLOPF EXECUTIVE DI 0.3% of Rev
BILL CLEMENTS Treasurer —
MARILYN CRAWFORD Board Member —
STEVE CROSS Board Member —
DAVID CROUSE Board Member —
ANDREW CUMMINGS Board Member —
DON DEFOSSET Board Member —
LIN HENKEL Board Member —
RICHARD HIRREL Board Member —
DAVID V JOHNSON FOUNDING CHA —
MATTHEW KACERGIS EXECUTIVE DI —
PAUL KNAPP Board Member —
BILL MANSFIELD Board Member —
SANDY MOSHER Board Member —
KATHLEEN OSWALD Board President —
WILLIAM PARFET Board President —
LISA HERRICK PARKER Board Member —
ANNETTE POCICA Board Member —
IRENE ROGERSON Board Member —
JANE WARNER Secretary —
KURT WIETZKE Board Member —
JASON ZYLSTRA Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW WAWRO Board Member 1.7% of Rev
JILL O'NEILL Executive Director 1.4% of Rev
KATHLEEN M OSWALD Board President —
WILLIAM PARFET Board President —
DAVID V JOHNSON Board President —
WILLIAM CLEMENTS Treasurer —
LISA HERRICK Secretary —
ANNETTE POCICA Board Member —
STEVEN CROSS Board Member —
MARILYN CRAWFORD Board Member —
DAVID CROUSE Board Member —
DON DEFOSSET Board Member —
PAMELLA DEVOS Board Member —
JENNIFER MERRIMAN Board Member —
IRENE ROGERSON Board Member —
KURT WIETZKE Board Member —
PAUL KNAPP Board Member —
ANDREW CUMMINGS Board Member —
LIN HENKEL Board Member —
SANDY MOSHER Board Member —
JANE WARNER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 32 points above the peer median (60 vs. 28).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.