Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 9.0% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 4.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 32.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 20.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 20.7% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 17.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOM ARNOLD Board President 9.6% of Rev
ROBERT PIECHOTA Board President
JOHN HELICKY Secretary
JESSIE SAYEGH CHAIRMAN
DOMINICK CARRILLO Board Member
FRANK GONZALEZ Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT PIECHOTA Board President 9.6% of Rev
TOM ARNOLD Board President 9.6% of Rev
JOHN HELICKY Secretary
JESSIE SAYEGH CHAIRMAN
DOMINICK CARRILLO Board Member
FRANK GONZALEZ Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in NJ for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.