Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 11.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 42.3% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 11.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 34.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TJ Bartt Board President
Paul Liffengren Board Member
Michelle Murphy Board Member
Bill Bruner Board Member
Sharlene Funk Board Member
Brian Banks Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TJ Bartt Board President
Paul Liffengren Board Member
Bethany Van Beek Board Member
Michelle Murphy Board Member
Bill Bruner Board Member
Sharlene Funk Board Member
Stephanie Wolverton Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORA HAIMES Executive Director 10.6% of Rev
SANDY MOOREHEAD Board President
ANDRA DENTON Treasurer
BETHANY VAN BEEK Secretary
TJ BARTT Board Member
BITSY BERNAT Board Member
PAUL LIFFENGREN Board Member
HALLIE HANNUM STUDENT BOARD REPRESENTATIVE
ALASKA JENKINS STUDENT BOARD REPRESENTATIVE
JUSTIN STEPHENS STUDENT BOARD REPRESENTATIVE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 19 points above the peer median (55 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 19 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 28 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.