Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 50 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATT DINGLEDINE Board President
BOB MULLER Treasurer
DON WESCOTT Secretary
JESSICA ELLIOTT Board Member
JOHN GLANCY Board Member
MARV PARKER Board Member
SIDNEY WIKE Board Member
AARON GREENE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHANNON HOOVER Board Member
MATT DINGLEDINE Board President
PETER TIFFANY Treasurer
JOE REID Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHANNON HOOVER Board Member
MATT DINGLEDINE Board President
PETER TIFFANY Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 97 other orgs in SC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (55 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 43 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.