Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 46 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 38 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dawn Auldridge | Board President | — | ||
| Kim Ames | Board President | — | ||
| Andrew Conley | Treasurer | — | ||
| Loreta Castillo | Secretary | — | ||
| Martina Rangel | Revenue Coordinator | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeanne Mulcahy | Board President | — | ||
| Liz Hahn-Dantona | Board President | — | ||
| Lisa Kaempfer | Secretary | — | ||
| Darla Agnes | Treasurer | — | ||
| Marti Heurich | Parliamentarian | — | ||
| Robin Miller | Revenue Coordinator | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 19 other orgs in MD with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: governance score sits 33 points below the peer median (50 vs. 83).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.