Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA HEATH-REYNOLDS Board President
JULIE GRAY Board President
CHRIS TAYLOR Board President
JOHANN SLETTO Board Member
SARA PULSE Board Member
MICHAEL BENNETT Board Member
MICHELLE BADE Board Member
KEITH ZIOLKOWSKI Board Member
JONATHON EDWARDS Board Member
ANDREA DRURY Board Member
NICK SCROGGINS Board Member
JESSICA BAKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIA HEATH-REYNOLDS Board President
JULIE GRAY Board President
CHRIS TAYLOR Board President
JOHANN SLETTO Board Member
SARA PULSE Board Member
MICHAEL BENNETT Board Member
MICHELLE BADE Board Member
KEITH ZIOLKOWSKI Board Member
JONATHON EDWARDS Board Member
ANDREA DRURY Board Member
NICK SCROGGINS Board Member
JESSICA BAKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in IN for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.