Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 60 Stable Stable Watch
2023 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN TUCKEY Board President
BYRON CRARY VICE PRESIDE
SANDY HAYNES SECETARY
DAVID HAWKINS Treasurer
ANNE CAMPAU Board Member
ANNA CLARK Board Member
PAM DEGOLIA Board Member
TIM HERNANDEZ Board Member
SCOTT MOILANEN Board Member
DOUG MUNN Board Member
KYLE ROCHELEAU Board Member
RANDY TREACHER Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN VANWAGNEN Board President
RANDY TREACHER VICE PRESIDE
LINDA SCHAUB SECETARY
DAVID HAWKINS Treasurer
ANNE CAMPAU Board Member
BYRON CRARY Board Member
PAM DEGOLIA Board Member
SANDY HAYNES Board Member
TIM HERNANDEZ Board Member
CARLA MAHAN Board Member
ROSS MAHAN Board Member
SCOTT MOILANEN Board Member
DOUG MUNN Board Member
STEVE TUCKEY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 185 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points above the peer median (90 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.