Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
60
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 60 Stable Stable Watch
2023 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 — — — 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVEN TUCKEY Board President —
BYRON CRARY VICE PRESIDE —
SANDY HAYNES SECETARY —
DAVID HAWKINS Treasurer —
ANNE CAMPAU Board Member —
ANNA CLARK Board Member —
PAM DEGOLIA Board Member —
TIM HERNANDEZ Board Member —
SCOTT MOILANEN Board Member —
DOUG MUNN Board Member —
KYLE ROCHELEAU Board Member —
RANDY TREACHER Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LYNN VANWAGNEN Board President —
RANDY TREACHER VICE PRESIDE —
LINDA SCHAUB SECETARY —
DAVID HAWKINS Treasurer —
ANNE CAMPAU Board Member —
BYRON CRARY Board Member —
PAM DEGOLIA Board Member —
SANDY HAYNES Board Member —
TIM HERNANDEZ Board Member —
CARLA MAHAN Board Member —
ROSS MAHAN Board Member —
SCOTT MOILANEN Board Member —
DOUG MUNN Board Member —
STEVE TUCKEY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
60 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 280 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points above the peer median (90 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.