Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 11.0% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 4.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 16.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOUISE IRVINE Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
PAULETTE WIENER Board President
MOSHE PLUTCHOK Secretary
RAANANAH KATZ Board Member
DONNA HALBERSTAM Board Member
SCOTT EISENMESSER Board Member
KEN EVANS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOUISE IRVINE Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
PAULETTE WIENER Board President
MOSHE PLUTCHOK Secretary
AVIVA FELDMAN Board Member
DONNA HALBERSTAM Board Member
SCOTT EISENMESSER Board Member
KEN EVANS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 48 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 52 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.