Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
58
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 58 Fragile Recovery
2022 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 59 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH FRANGIEH Secretary
NANCY KINDELAN Board Member
LISA RAFFERTY Treasurer
CASEY BAINES Board Member
GIANNE L DOHERTRY Board Member
ERICA SHOM Board President
PAULA MCLAUGHLIN Board Member
SIERRA HAMMOND Board Member
MEREDITH DAWSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH FRANGIEH Board President
SOPHIE RICH Board Member
NANCY KINDELAN Board Member
NICOLE LEONARD Board Member
LISA RAFFERTY Board Member
CASEY BAINES Board Member
GIANNE L DOHERTRY Board Member
ERICA SHOM Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points above the peer median (75 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.