Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 50 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LaShawn Walker Treasurer
Lynna Hollis Board President
Janel Nakia Motley Secretary
Joann B Williams Officer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lynna Hollis Board President
Janel Nakia Motley Secretary
Joann B Williams Officer
LaShawn Walker Treasurer
Kendra Connett Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 195 other orgs in IL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points above the peer median (65 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.