Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
30
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARYBETH WILHELM Treasurer
ALICIA BUSHEY Board President
KAREN BRETT Board President
KEELIN DAWE Secretary
JEFF DANIELS Board Member
AMY WILICHOSKI Board President
CHENAY HAMPE Board President
ALEX GROVER Board Member
MIKE BARRY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMY DAMICO Treasurer
ALICIA BUSHEY Board President
JEN BOWLER Board President
JESSICA NOLAN Secretary
JEFF DANIELS Board Member
AMY EMERY Board President
JUDILYNNE KASSIOTIS Board President
ALEX GROVER Board Member
MIKE BARRY Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in MA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.