Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY ANDERSON Secretary
LUANN KEYES Board Member
JEWLY KRAUSE Board President
KORINA WOOD Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEWLY KRAUSE Board President
LUANN KEYES Board Member
WENDY ANDERSON Secretary
KORINA WOOD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JEWLY KRAUSE Board President
LUANN KEYES Board Member
WENDY ANDERSON Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.