Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Governance Advisory

📋 Compliance Status

State Annual Report
Status: OVERDUE
Overdue: 192 days

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAY MORTENSEN Secretary
WENDY JOHNSON Board Member
MICHEL LEGER Board Member
MARIO VALENCIA Board President
PAUL ANWAY Board Member
RACHEL O'CONNOR Board Member
TIM JACKSON Board Member
MICHELLE GRAHAM Board Member
JOHN SHELTON Board Member
FRANK RENZ Board Member
JERRY MATTHEWS Board President
BRENT CAREY Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 30 points below the peer median (15 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.