Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
40
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 25.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 10.4% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 11.2% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 11.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 8.0% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 14.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 13.7% 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — 9.5% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.9% of Rev
MICHAEL CROPP CHAIRMAN —
PAMELA HOKANSON Board President —
WILLIAM WELLS CPA Treasurer —
JOESPEH BACH Secretary —
CYNTHIA R BASS Board Member —
LAKETA COOPER CPC Board Member —
LUKE CUSACK Board Member —
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member —
ROBERT D GIOIA Board Member —
DENIS GUERIN Board Member —
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member —
STEPHANIE RIVERA Board Member —
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member —
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member —
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.0% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President —
PAMELA HOKANSON Board President —
MARIO URSO Treasurer —
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary —
JOSEPH BACH Board Member —
MICHAEL CROPP MD Board Member —
LUKE CUSACK Board Member —
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member —
DENIS GUERIN Board Member —
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member —
NORMA NOWAK PHD Board Member —
CHIWUIKE OWUNANNE Board Member —
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member —
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member —
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member —
EMILY TUCKER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.0% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President —
DENIS GUERIN Board President —
MARIO URSO Treasurer —
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary —
JOSEPH BACH Board Member —
MICHAEL CROPP Board Member —
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member —
PAMELA HOKANSON Board Member —
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member —
DR NORMA NOWAK Board Member —
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member —
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member —
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member —
EMILY TUCKER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.7% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President —
DENIS GUERIN Board President —
MARIO URSO Treasurer —
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary —
JOSEPH BACK Board Member —
MICHAEL CROPP Board Member —
GRETCHEN FIERLE Board Member —
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member —
PAMELA HOKANSON Board Member —
KAWANZA HUMPHREY Board Member —
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member —
DR NORMA NOWACK Board Member —
SANDY SCHEFFLER Board Member —
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member —
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member —
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member —
EMILY TUCKER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,227 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.