Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
40
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 25.5% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 5.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 10.4% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 11.2% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 11.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 8.0% 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 14.5% 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 8.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2014 13.7% 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 9.5% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.9% of Rev
MICHAEL CROPP CHAIRMAN
PAMELA HOKANSON Board President
WILLIAM WELLS CPA Treasurer
JOESPEH BACH Secretary
CYNTHIA R BASS Board Member
LAKETA COOPER CPC Board Member
LUKE CUSACK Board Member
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member
ROBERT D GIOIA Board Member
DENIS GUERIN Board Member
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member
STEPHANIE RIVERA Board Member
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.0% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President
PAMELA HOKANSON Board President
MARIO URSO Treasurer
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary
JOSEPH BACH Board Member
MICHAEL CROPP MD Board Member
LUKE CUSACK Board Member
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member
DENIS GUERIN Board Member
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member
NORMA NOWAK PHD Board Member
CHIWUIKE OWUNANNE Board Member
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member
EMILY TUCKER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.0% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President
DENIS GUERIN Board President
MARIO URSO Treasurer
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary
JOSEPH BACH Board Member
MICHAEL CROPP Board Member
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member
PAMELA HOKANSON Board Member
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member
DR NORMA NOWAK Board Member
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member
EMILY TUCKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GINA BURKHARDT Executive Director 18.7% of Rev
ROBERT D GIOIA Board President
DENIS GUERIN Board President
MARIO URSO Treasurer
CATHERINE LEWIS Secretary
JOSEPH BACK Board Member
MICHAEL CROPP Board Member
GRETCHEN FIERLE Board Member
NICKOLE GARRISON Board Member
PAMELA HOKANSON Board Member
KAWANZA HUMPHREY Board Member
JOHN MITCHELL Board Member
DR NORMA NOWACK Board Member
SANDY SCHEFFLER Board Member
RACHEL STENCLIK Board Member
SCOTT STENCLIK Board Member
KEVIN SZCZEPANSKI Board Member
EMILY TUCKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 700 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.